Once again Defying the law and mandate changed the party

The merge continued to grow, as soon as the medicine took place. Party change has been an incurable disease like the cancer of the Indian parliamentary system. In the treatment of this tendency to create instability in the political system and to defame the mandates, there were serious legal reforms twice during the tenure of Rajivji and Atalji. From time to time, voices of concern were also raised from the judiciary. After those reforms, it was felt that this trend would be controlled, but after a few days the more frightening form of the disease started emerging, almost like cancer. The foundation of those reforms was based on a formula to prevent separation from the parliamentary or legislative party, either alone or in a very small group. Otherwise there was a danger of membership in the situation. Perhaps the thinking behind this was that no one would want to lose the membership of the legislature, the ultimate achievement of his life or career, and consequently avoid this mischief.

    Cancer of the change of party has now developed the ability to resist even the above mentioned treatments in the political system. Now MLAs have started changing parties by resigning from the membership of the legislature in very small groups to bring down the governments. Under the four hundred karan project, the experiment of a modest initiative to topple any state government in this way is discussed. There were reports in such incidents that the loyalty of the MLAs is being bought from thirty to forty karan. In this way, the elected governments evolved in this era with the horrific nature of the cut or break of the legal established prohibitive against them for the purpose of reversing the party. Along with horse-trading and political-tourism etc., the very squid face of our political culture has come out with it. Its effective diagnosis and treatment is a serious issue of time demand and debate. There is no hope for any effective concrete initiative in this direction from the parliamentary circles.  Yes, effective intervention by the judiciary may lead to some such way in the coming days, it can be expected that some of the mandate and democracy along with money power and vested political selfish forces should be prohibited from such rape.

         In the above situations, discussion on two measures can be carried forward.

(1) A voter elects his MLA or MP for a full five years, but he resigns from the membership of the legislature in the midst of cause or without any reasonable reason or due to lack of opportunity in the executive or due to any improper interest. If it is, then it should be assumed that he is ambushed by demise and he is not a worthy person for public representation.
       Therefore, he should be considered ineligible to contest elections permanently or for a few years.
(2) When the provisions to recover compensation from those who have caused damage to public property are being used, then by resigning from the said conditions and intent on the same lines to create the condition of bye-elections and to burden the public funds for those elections. Also, resignation should be considered responsible for their exodus and the amount of that election expenditure should be recovered from public money.

  Such legal reforms or their judicial directives will curb this new and burning mischief.